The freight industry has won a battle around tagging of animals with law passed making it the responsibility of farmers and not truck drivers.
The National Animal Identification and Tracing Amendment Bill (No 2) was passed in Parliament on Tuesday by the Primary Production Select Committee.
It follows months of submissions by the trucking industry and the Road Transport Forum which argued that animal tagging was beyond the mandate of livestock transporters.
The RTF provides services to the National Livestock Transport and Safety Group which represents around 95% of the commercial livestock transport industry with around 280 companies operating 2,600 livestock vehicles.
“We would like to thank the Primary Production Select Committee members familiar with transporting animals for listening to industry and working hard to get an amendment to the bill to provide some kind of indemnity for transport operators,” RTF chief executive Nick Leggett says.
“Now, whenever anyone has to fill in the declaration forms around the animals that are leaving their property, there will be a new section that will be included, basically giving an indemnity to the trucking companies that the farmer has tagged the animals appropriately.
“This is what we asked for, including by appearing before the select committee, because the farmers are responsible for their stock, not the trucking company.
“We note the Government has a tendency to promote reliance on technology that does not exist yet to solve problems, such as scanning to identify NAIT tags on stock as they enter a truck. Industry doesn’t support fitting scanners to trucks and we hope they find suitable funding to develop technologies to make compliance easier for farmers,” Leggett says.
“Livestock transporters care about New Zealand’s biosecurity and accept that animals must be traced to ensure their lifetime movements can be monitored in the event of any disease outbreaks.
“But essentially, they are moving animals they have no responsibility for, other than when they are on the truck. Often, they will be loading those animals alone in the dark, and sometimes the animals are moving at pace in tight enclosed spaces, so the truck driver cannot be expected to safely visually check every animal accurately for a small electronic tag.
“We think this new law has taken the correct approach in acknowledging that, and while there are some things to work out on the required paperwork, we think pragmatism has won the day,” he says.
The freight industry has won a battle around tagging of animals with law passed making it the responsibility of farmers and not truck drivers.
The National Animal Identification and Tracing Amendment Bill (No 2) was passed in Parliament on Tuesday by the Primary Production Select Committee.
It follows months of submissions by the trucking industry and the Road Transport Forum which argued that animal tagging was beyond the mandate of livestock transporters.
The RTF provides services to the National Livestock Transport and Safety Group which represents around 95% of the commercial livestock transport industry with around 280 companies operating 2,600 livestock vehicles.
“We would like to thank the Primary Production Select Committee members familiar with transporting animals for listening to industry and working hard to get an amendment to the bill to provide some kind of indemnity for transport operators,” RTF chief executive Nick Leggett says.
“Now, whenever anyone has to fill in the declaration forms around the animals that are leaving their property, there will be a new section that will be included, basically giving an indemnity to the trucking companies that the farmer has tagged the animals appropriately.
“This is what we asked for, including by appearing before the select committee, because the farmers are responsible for their stock, not the trucking company.
“We note the Government has a tendency to promote reliance on technology that does not exist yet to solve problems, such as scanning to identify NAIT tags on stock as they enter a truck. Industry doesn’t support fitting scanners to trucks and we hope they find suitable funding to develop technologies to make compliance easier for farmers,” Leggett says.
“Livestock transporters care about New Zealand’s biosecurity and accept that animals must be traced to ensure their lifetime movements can be monitored in the event of any disease outbreaks.
“But essentially, they are moving animals they have no responsibility for, other than when they are on the truck. Often, they will be loading those animals alone in the dark, and sometimes the animals are moving at pace in tight enclosed spaces, so the truck driver cannot be expected to safely visually check every animal accurately for a small electronic tag.
“We think this new law has taken the correct approach in acknowledging that, and while there are some things to work out on the required paperwork, we think pragmatism has won the day,” he says.
